WatchDorks.Net wrote:It's easy to jump to that conclusion, but playing devil's advocate for just a sec TB, what if someone participated at WG for reasons other than Invicter? ....It's easy to sit back and lump all members there together (I know I certainly do at times) and I think we sometimes assume that everyone at WG loved Invicter.
Dorks, I love ya, but I have no tolerance for Geek nation. None. Remember the dead koi website? The threads over there suggesting we sabotaged their little tree house? Our owner's dealings? Mass bannings, lies, distortions, loud conversations, and too many IWG FUBARS to count? All the bad stuff stemmed from that dump.
No tolerance from this quarter, friend. Call me a prick, but to be a member there after all this stuff was in full disclosure? I don't give a rat's ass what the excuse is - if you're surrounded by liars and softies and choose to stay, it's on you. You know it's not a "relationship with D/D, not diamonds, not standstone, and the main owner treats you like crap? And you stay? It's on you, I don't care who's "nice."
And stay to learn about Androids and Deep Blue? Learn what
, pray tell?
Now found at bestdamnwatchforum.