I'm not going to lose because I'm not going to play his game.... I don't know the guy from Adam, but what I perceive here is a very angry man, and possibly a delusional paranoid...
and you see the continued attacks and false accusations that I get from folks like TemerityB, can you see why I'd want to change that?
You're not changing dick, Huey, unless you finally figure out how to work the pins on your diaper. Notice the white colored type on my screen name here? I didn't get that with bubble gum wrappers; I had to earn the respect of the members and owners here. In that light, you're in way over your head, rook.
Delusional paranoid? So valid criticism is "paranoia" in your world. Here's a concept: Find a point made that isn't valid, then refute it. Other than that, you're just sticking and running, like a a certain 400-pound Texas turd who ran outta here blowing snot bubbles about a year ago.
Good lord, are you a whiny little know-nothing. Here's what your short and hopefully soon-to-be-over tenure at this blog has been: You're like a subscriber to Motor Trend
who gets two issues in the mail, then writes a letter to the editor complaining that ther aren't any Ford Focus and Toyota Yaris on the cover. Hey, you like cars, and your Focus does everything that a Bentley Continental does, so what's the big deal about Bentleys and Porches? Fords and Chevy Cruises run down the same roads they do - forget that expensive stuff and concentrate on MY car - or maybe even used cars!
To continue to be blunt - your criticism of our take on Invicta MAKES YOU a Geek boi on its very face. You openly stood up for a brand on the very same thread is pointed out to clearly rip off its customers. What, did you miss something? Incredible.
Here's one more tip for ya, Pointdexter: Nobody's "attacking" anyone. When a post is as blatantly, incredibly, and woefully ridiculous as your take was, you deserve to be de-pantsed. And your take on this particular topic is amazingly dunderheaded. But even in your later comments, you're stickin' with it, eh?
About two years ago, I got into a big row here with another member over comments about WGs; he thought I was coming on much too strong. Know what we did? We argued it out, right here in the open, and in the end we agreed on some points, not on others. The other member was a real man about it - he came at me strong, and I returned the volleys. In the end, it all worked out - mainly because the man knew what the fuck he was talking about.
You, on the other hand? No proof of that.