Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post your watch reviews here
Post Reply
User avatar
jason_recliner
ASSHAT
Posts: 10873
Joined: September 17th 2011, 10:00pm
Contact:

Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by jason_recliner » July 14th 2024, 5:02am

Image

The watch I’m wearing as I type this – Citizen’s BN0116-51L – is so good - so legible, accurate, comfortable, reliable and durable - it just might be, objectively the best analogue three-hand watch in the world. Focusing on what isn’t perfect, rather than the plethora of positive attributes, will make for a more succinct, concise, objectively better review.

Image

Getting a really good fit isn’t as easy as it should be. The holes in the strap are too far apart, presumably to allow space for the chunky metal eyelets and maintain sufficient unbroken Kevlar fibres between each hole. Immensely strong and feather-light the strap may be, but it’s usually a bit too loose or a bit too tight for my wrist.

Image

The bracelet doesn’t fit much better. The links are too long and it doesn’t include any half links. And although the clasp has ratcheting adjustment, I don’t like the appearance when the adjuster is pulled out so I tolerate a looser than ideal fit.

Image

Image

The ratchet adjustment on the clasp is pretty rough. The buttons must be pushed overly forcefully, and movement of the extension piece through the ratchet teeth is a bit crunchy. The buttons and the clasp body don’t look too flash, either - definitely cheaper-looking than the rest of the watch.

Image

The 116 comes on a bracelet and the 118 comes on a Kevlar strap. The 118 should come with a spare strap as replacements are prohibitively expensive. The primary reason I have two versions of the same watch is I wanted a blue dial watch with the choice of bracelet or strap, and it only comes on the bracelet. The strap was so expensive it was only slightly dearer to buy the watch as well.

Image

Image

A laser-etched Eco-Drive ‘globe’ logo features on the back of the 116 whereas the 118 is sterile (apart from specs and serial number), for reasons unknown. Perhaps one is JDM and one is for export (both were bought from an AD in England). Laser etching doesn’t wear well in my experience; both should have a deeply stamped ‘globe’ logo, ideally, or engraved at least.

Image

And that’s it for the negatives. These watches are otherwise objectively superb and practically perfect in every way. They are so light and the case so beautifully contoured that they disappear on the wrist. The features are straight out of an engineer’s wet dream with monocoque titanium construction, Kevlar strap, internal-AR sapphire, 300m water resistance, and a very accurate solar-powered movement. The Duratect Super Titanium is as new after around a year of very regular wear, including swimming in the pool but not in the sea.

Image

Lume has been applied so thickly, and is so glossy, it looks like you should be able to dig in with a spoon and enjoy. Brightness is extremely impressive but that of the 118 seems to surpass the 116, if I’m not imagining it, and is utterly shine-on-to-the-wall nuclear.Practicality is equally as superlative as the technology, engineering and quality. The crown is knurled for faultless grip every time. The clasp has push-buttons as well as a fold-over lock. The dial and handset are the most perfectly legible I’ve seen, bar none.

Even the paper used for the box is nice, a bit special, perhaps reflecting Citizen's current preoccupation with using it as a watchmaking material?

Image

But putting a nice box aside, do practicality, legibility, integrity, quality and durability equal desirability? Are the ginormous Arabics and arrow-shaped hour hand a little oafish and clumsy? A little My First Watch? Or, dare I say, My Last Watch? Do you want a watch that's been designed seemingly with the objectives of suitability for ages 4-104 and surviving any incident that will finish you off? These Citizens might be superbly designed and engineered high-quality near-indestructible techno-fests for the wrist, but stylish they are not. I absolutely love them but very much understand why the next person may not care for them one bit.

Image
Last edited by jason_recliner on July 15th 2024, 5:04pm, edited 2 times in total.
Copyright Reclinervision 2020 Productions. All rights reserved.

If it thinks, it stinks
User avatar
bedlam
Senior Member & WIS
Posts: 9769
Joined: November 12th 2011, 11:00pm
Location: Fremantle, Australia (GMT +8)
Contact:

Re: Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by bedlam » July 14th 2024, 7:02am

Citizen hit this one out of the park IMO
Meritocracy: the privilege, wealth and advancement of those who chose their parents wisely.
Capitalism: a cult that promised to do good for the worst reasons.
Nationalism: a profound longing to go back to a past that never existed.
User avatar
MAX
Founding Member & Master of Time
Posts: 1748
Joined: May 23rd 2013, 10:00pm
Location: Too Far South, Floriduh
Contact:

Re: Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by MAX » July 15th 2024, 3:59am

Always been a Citizen fan-boy and that watch is really nice. Eco-Drive is outstanding.
NRPI and Shitheel here.

“Begin at the beginning," the King said, very gravely, "and go on till you come to the end: then stop.”

If I am to be insulted I must first value your opinion.
User avatar
jason_recliner
ASSHAT
Posts: 10873
Joined: September 17th 2011, 10:00pm
Contact:

Re: Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by jason_recliner » July 15th 2024, 5:08pm

Thanks very much Gentlemen! I'm very proud of this one. Not gonna lie, no need for false modesty, The last 5 or so reviews have elevated me not just into, but atop, the upper steps of the pantheon of the world's greatest watch reviewers.

:bvbvbv:
bbattle wrote:
July 14th 2024, 2:19pm
Very nice review! Concise and to the point: awesome watch, not so great strap and bracelet. There are other companies that go a long way with that formula.
Yes, but if the strap fit me it would be a 10. The Kevlar is wearing in so nicely, and it has a soft absorbent backing. Hoping that if I bulk up a bit more the strap will fit perfectly. And it's freaking KEVLAR!
Copyright Reclinervision 2020 Productions. All rights reserved.

If it thinks, it stinks
User avatar
AlbertaTime
Master of Time
Posts: 4959
Joined: October 13th 2010, 10:00pm
Location: Peace River, Alberta
Contact:

Re: Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by AlbertaTime » July 16th 2024, 9:52am

I agree about the review--really well done. And the watch is one of my favorite designs from Citizen. I have a friend in town with a huge Citizen collection (like maybe 40 pieces).

The attention to quality on the cases and dials is extremely high. I left seeing his collection with great respect for Citizen.
Curator: Alberta Museum of Chinese Horology in Peace River

"That stone buddha deserves all the birdshit it gets. I wave my skinny arms like a tall flower in the wind." Ikkyu
User avatar
jason_recliner
ASSHAT
Posts: 10873
Joined: September 17th 2011, 10:00pm
Contact:

Re: Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by jason_recliner » July 16th 2024, 8:55pm

Thanks again everyone, still wearing the blue one, still loving it.
Racer-X wrote:
July 16th 2024, 4:13pm
Excellent review, nice watch. Maybe try a sailcloth strap. I heard good things about this one at StrapsCo.

https://strapsco.com/product/dassari-sailcloth-strap/

Thanks AT, yes, I intend to get a textile strap or two, give the Kevlar a rest. As much as I love these watches, I don't really want to be buying more of them because I need more Kevlar straps.
Copyright Reclinervision 2020 Productions. All rights reserved.

If it thinks, it stinks
User avatar
jason_recliner
ASSHAT
Posts: 10873
Joined: September 17th 2011, 10:00pm
Contact:

Re: Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by jason_recliner » July 24th 2024, 4:11pm

smellody wrote:
July 24th 2024, 5:58am
jason_recliner wrote:
July 23rd 2024, 11:12pm
The blue dial fell on to bitumen pavement from around car seat height. Not one mark on it that I can see. Very impressive.
How did you do that?
Stupid mistake. Out for a trail run, put the watch on my car seat under a hoodie before the run, picked the hoodie up off the seat when I returned and it went flying out the door :dssd:
Copyright Reclinervision 2020 Productions. All rights reserved.

If it thinks, it stinks
User avatar
smellody
Owner
Posts: 12309
Joined: December 18th 2009, 11:00pm
Location: OR
Contact:

Re: Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by smellody » July 24th 2024, 4:52pm

jason_recliner wrote:
July 24th 2024, 4:11pm
smellody wrote:
July 24th 2024, 5:58am
jason_recliner wrote:
July 23rd 2024, 11:12pm
The blue dial fell on to bitumen pavement from around car seat height. Not one mark on it that I can see. Very impressive.
How did you do that?
Stupid mistake. Out for a trail run, put the watch on my car seat under a hoodie before the run, picked the hoodie up off the seat when I returned and it went flying out the door :dssd:
Ouch. Good to hear it can take a lickin'!
Pete26
Member
Posts: 232
Joined: June 5th 2015, 3:14pm
Contact:

Re: Can a Watch be Too Good? Citizen BN0116-51L and BN0118-04E Review

Post by Pete26 » July 29th 2024, 4:39pm

Great review Toby, Citizen certainly offer bang for the buck. I have owned a few Duratect watches over the years, but got a sat wave green diver from Starbuy and noticed that it actually had gouges on the back. I was always fairly careful with my watches so don't know how it happened. I sold the watch to our friend Kev in Newcastle with full disclosure and recently bought this one from a great jeweller in Tassie. The watch runs on the same movements as yours.

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Watch Reviews”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest