The obligatory intro & 3 pages of prattle

Post Reply
User avatar
Falstaff
Watchlord WIS
Posts: 9125
Joined: August 31st 2010, 10:00pm
Contact:
Contact Falstaff

Re: The obligatory intro & 3 pages of prattle

Post by Falstaff » May 13th 2012, 7:56am

Tzimisces wrote:Jump right out and shout MARINE CORPS!
And if my 'chute don't open round, I'll be the first one on the ground.

There are times when I am in deep relaxation when I feel I'm about to be struck withTHE answer.

I do believe the answer is 42. The trick is finding the question.




I believe it was "What is 6 X 7?"
Dies mei sicut umbra declinaverunt
User avatar
anonymous-10

Post by anonymous-10 » May 13th 2012, 8:30am

Will you all kindly shut the fuck up??
User avatar
Mortuus Fakeuus

Re: The obligatory intro & 3 pages of prattle

Post by Mortuus Fakeuus » May 13th 2012, 1:54pm

foghorn wrote:Will you all kindly shut the fuck up??


THAT is the LOST EQUATION, the answer we've ALL been LOOKING for since this endless comparison of 'rectal databases' began...!!
Image
WELL DONE, Foggy!!...the first ladle of tronya is on me... Image
User avatar
Guest

Re: The obligatory intro & 3 pages of prattle

Post by Guest » May 15th 2012, 2:22am

bigedsurf wrote:The angle of the dangle is equal and proportionate to the mass of the ass..............


Piker!

Three Navaho women sit side by side on the ground. The first woman, who is sitting on a buffalo skin, has a son who weighs 70 pounds. The second woman, who is sitting on a deer skin, has a son who weighs 80 pounds. The third woman who weighs 150 pounds is sitting on a hippopotamus skin.


The moral: the squaw of the hippopotamus is equal to the sons of the squaws of the other two hides.
User avatar
Guest

Re: The obligatory intro & 3 pages of prattle

Post by Guest » May 15th 2012, 6:52am

oceanaut wrote: Image


"What the fuck is this shit", you ask. It is mostly people laughing at their own farts. And even accounting for the methane that is less destructive than many other human activities.
User avatar
Mortuus Fakeuus

Re: The obligatory intro & 3 pages of prattle

Post by Mortuus Fakeuus » May 15th 2012, 2:01pm

I liked it better when y'all were talking about partickle fizzicks n' shit...

...and, oh Jeebus Cripes, where are my manners?

Welcome to the most intelli-gunt watch for'm on the 'net, [color=yellow]Entrophic Timer. We cover everything, from fartz to fried-okra-fizzes, and back again. BTW, I once tried to be an Entrophic Timer, but got thoroughly spooked when the just-pulled human molar really did dissolve overnite in a glass of Coca-Cola. (Ewww!!) Better living thru chemistry indeed!

BTW, if you really are as old and crotchety as you suggest, perhaps you oughtta call yourself an Entrophic OLD-Timer. Just a thought, mind you. ANY-how, welcome to you again, and stay away from the local fresh winkles--they give you terrible gas pockets in your intestinal fistulae...which would make you an Enterec Timer in the, uhm, end, er, if you will. (I'll be here all week, try the veal... Image )

And don't be too hard on good 'ol Falstaff - he's still very upset about the family brewery in New Orleans...seems that all the horses got sick and died, and the rest was pretty much downhill after that. They did a 'thing' about it on the History Channel a while back, but I was busy watching 'The Prunella Scales Story' on Lifetime, so that's all I know about it...

Oh, and one more thing: two words - Bolt Zues...you can thank me later... Image [/color]
User avatar
mosc
Senior Member & WIS
Posts: 771
Joined: April 3rd 2011, 10:00pm
Location: Allentown, PA
Contact:
Contact mosc

Re: The obligatory intro & 3 pages of prattle

Post by mosc » May 16th 2012, 8:37am

Welcome to Watchlords, ET. It's about time we got someone who can get Schrodinger's cat in the box and Seuss's Cat In The Hat into one unified forum topic.

@ Falstaff - Existon; brilliant! I can't wait until you develop the theory for the Antiexiston, and their virtual particle pairs the Virtual Existon and the Virtual Antiexiston.
Watch collecting is a disastrous trap and I'm stuck. At least I always know what time it is.
User avatar
Falstaff
Watchlord WIS
Posts: 9125
Joined: August 31st 2010, 10:00pm
Contact:
Contact Falstaff

Re: The obligatory intro & 3 pages of prattle

Post by Falstaff » May 16th 2012, 9:28am

mosc wrote:Welcome to Watchlords, ET. It's about time we got someone who can get Schrodinger's cat in the box and Seuss's Cat In The Hat into one unified forum topic.

@ Falstaff - Existon; brilliant! I can't wait until you develop the theory for the Antiexiston, and their virtual particle pairs the Virtual Existon and the Virtual Antiexiston.




No need to do so - you just did! That's the beauty of the Existon - no need for such contrivances as anti-existons and the rest. It is simplicity itself - all forms of matter and energy (including all the vast array of subatomic particles) are but different conglomerations (or arrangements, if you prefer) of existons governed by local conditions. Gravity is the prime condition - defined as an affinity of the existing for the existing. In other words, things that exist are drawn to other things that exist. Everything that exists must clearly affect every other thing that exists to a greater or lesser extent due to sheer proximity. There is no alternative. So gravity represents a framework of the ability to become. An arrangement of existons in X space, influenced by not only the proximity of other local existons (or their constructs), but to a lesser extent by all other existons might be an atom of carbon. In Y space, however, governed (of necessity) by a different set of local conditions, that same arrangement of existons might well be an atom of tungsten or a giraffe. So your posited anti-existon and their virtual twins are simply different arrangements of existons behaving as local conditions dictate.



The Existon is simplicity itself. It's result of the "divide this object in half again and again and again and again" scenario - no matter how many times it is divided in half, 2 halves remain to be divided in half again. There is nothing that can be done to cause them to cease to exist, the pieces simply get smaller. The Existon is my postulated cannot-be-further-divided "smallest piece" - its sole property is that it exists.



I will certainly admit that my reasoning is philosophical rather than empirical, but I'm willing for some other geek to do the maths. The difficulty is in the needlessly confusing, increasingly proliferating number of quantum level constructs - the trees that hide the forest from view. Many of these constructs are no more important or necessary to the actual operation of the universe than a hot dog is to a baseball game.
Dies mei sicut umbra declinaverunt
Post Reply

Return to “Welcome! Introduce Yourself”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests