The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Post Reply
User avatar
MKTheVintageBloke
Master of Time
Posts: 3700
Joined: December 7th 2016, 2:47pm
Facebook ID: 0
Contact:
Contact MKTheVintageBloke

Re: The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Post by MKTheVintageBloke » March 1st 2017, 3:51pm

Guess it could be a bit smaller, 38-39mm would be enough, methinks...

Not quite sure about the crystal, but a domed mineral one isn't a good idea, IMO... Will gather a lot of scratches, only unlike with hesalite, Polywatch won't help.

Otherwise, a beautiful watch.
I always hope for the best. Experience, unfortunately, has taught me to expect the worst.
Elim Garak, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

No good deed ever goes unpunished.
Rule of Acquisition no.285
User avatar
bedlam (Online)
WIS Divemaster
Posts: 9219
Joined: November 12th 2011, 11:00pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Fremantle, Australia (GMT +8)
Contact:
Contact bedlam

Re: The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Post by bedlam » March 1st 2017, 4:39pm

MKTheVintageBloke wrote:Guess it could be a bit smaller, 38-39mm would be enough, methinks...

Not quite sure about the crystal, but a domed mineral one isn't a good idea, IMO... Will gather a lot of scratches, only unlike with hesalite, Polywatch won't help.

Otherwise, a beautiful watch.

It's wasn't purchased as a daily wearer, so the scratch issue wouldn't loom large.

I just can't like gold on a watch anyway, but a cheap gold watch seems like an even worse idea.
Meritocracy: the privilege, wealth and advancement of those who chose their parents wisely.
User avatar
biglove
Watchlord WIS
Posts: 15126
Joined: October 27th 2013, 9:18am
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Louisiana
Contact:
Contact biglove

Re: The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Post by biglove » March 1st 2017, 5:24pm

bedlam wrote:
MKTheVintageBloke wrote:Guess it could be a bit smaller, 38-39mm would be enough, methinks...

Not quite sure about the crystal, but a domed mineral one isn't a good idea, IMO... Will gather a lot of scratches, only unlike with hesalite, Polywatch won't help.

Otherwise, a beautiful watch.

It's wasn't purchased as a daily wearer, so the scratch issue wouldn't loom large.

I just can't like gold on a watch anyway, but a cheap gold watch seems like an even worse idea.


Now, if the watch is solid gold, that is another story for me. Few things are sexier than a gold Rolex. Gold plate/fusion/coating/filled is another story entirely. Never looks right.
My best friend from college shared his secret to his huge financial success, "I fell out of the right vagina."

"We should just sanction stupidity as our national pastime and be done with it."-TemerityB, WL Asshat
User avatar
MKTheVintageBloke
Master of Time
Posts: 3700
Joined: December 7th 2016, 2:47pm
Facebook ID: 0
Contact:
Contact MKTheVintageBloke

Re: The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Post by MKTheVintageBloke » March 1st 2017, 5:32pm

Well, if we're talking about gold... I tend to get a gold-plated watch when a) it's a bargain b) it's collectible. I don't think I would ever buy a contemporary gold plated watch... The Orient certainly looks nice, as I've already said, but durability-wise, I'd prefer the steel version.
I always hope for the best. Experience, unfortunately, has taught me to expect the worst.
Elim Garak, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

No good deed ever goes unpunished.
Rule of Acquisition no.285
Post Reply

Return to “Orient”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest