Re: 42mm Aragon Divemaster NH36, Ceramic, Sapphire for $139
Watch Noob wrote: ↑January 14th 2021, 11:29amhttps://www.aragonwatch.com/ARAGON_Dive ... 199blu.htm
Seems like a helluva deal
Watch Noob wrote: ↑January 14th 2021, 11:29amhttps://www.aragonwatch.com/ARAGON_Dive ... 199blu.htm
Seems like a helluva deal
I saw a YouTube video and prompted me to take a look. I always though Wing had design talent and from the specs on this watch at that price range I think it's a deal. 70% of his watches are borderline Invicta clown size which is a turnoff so when I saw he came out with a 42mm Diver I had to peek
T-Man, per this comment above. First off as a disclaimer, I could give 2 shits about anyone buying one, I know I'm not.
Careful, careful. Liang's bracelets pull more hair than the Fabulous Moolah, or the straps feel like bowling ball sandpaper. Also, Android/Aragon is well-known (and based on the ones I just received) for wobbly hands and uneven dial work. I mean, ya get what you pay for - man does not live on movements alone.Watch Noob wrote: ↑January 15th 2021, 2:58pmT-Man, per this comment above. First off as a disclaimer, I could give 2 shits about anyone buying one, I know I'm not.
But....
The size is what drove me to even look at this watch. The looks as I suspect is the main driver of any watch anyone has ever purchased. Sure you could buy a watch based on the movement, but if it looked like shit would you wear it?
Now then, unless Master Wing is knocking of Seiko's NH movements in a tiny Vietnamese village south of Hanoi, a NH 35 or NH36 is what it is no matter who's brand it's in.
On to the other components, Ceramic Bezel and Sapphire crystal. Sure there's different grades of each, but unless you can get a manufacturer to actually tell you what grade they are using, I'll just stick with the material name.
IMO the price is in the right range for this particular watch. I see watches all day at $300+ using the NH movements which you can buy for $40, and wonder whyyyyy?
Duly noted Sir. Not sure how we got off on this tangent with me seemingly defending Aragon.TemerityB wrote: ↑January 15th 2021, 6:26pmCareful, careful. Liang's bracelets pull more hair than the Fabulous Moolah, or the straps feel like bowling ball sandpaper. Also, Android/Aragon is well-known (and based on the ones I just received) for wobbly hands and uneven dial work. I mean, ya get what you pay for - man does not live on movements alone.Watch Noob wrote: ↑January 15th 2021, 2:58pmT-Man, per this comment above. First off as a disclaimer, I could give 2 shits about anyone buying one, I know I'm not.
But....
The size is what drove me to even look at this watch. The looks as I suspect is the main driver of any watch anyone has ever purchased. Sure you could buy a watch based on the movement, but if it looked like shit would you wear it?
Now then, unless Master Wing is knocking of Seiko's NH movements in a tiny Vietnamese village south of Hanoi, a NH 35 or NH36 is what it is no matter who's brand it's in.
On to the other components, Ceramic Bezel and Sapphire crystal. Sure there's different grades of each, but unless you can get a manufacturer to actually tell you what grade they are using, I'll just stick with the material name.
IMO the price is in the right range for this particular watch. I see watches all day at $300+ using the NH movements which you can buy for $40, and wonder whyyyyy?
Nevertheless, Time Person of the Year is nothing to sneeze at.
So was Ethel Rosenberg, and look what happened to her.jason_recliner wrote: ↑January 16th 2021, 12:30amNevertheless, Time Person of the Year is nothing to sneeze at.
Thanks, I needed that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest