Lets talk about Clerc Baby! and the SWI wannabe

Post Reply
User avatar
koimaster
Founder
Posts: 41365
Joined: December 16th 2009, 11:00pm
Location: Oregon, Thanks for visiting! Now go back home!
Contact:

Lets talk about Clerc Baby! and the SWI wannabe

Post by koimaster » June 26th 2015, 9:01am

The "swiss watch international" "swiss" Legend Scubador which is a Clerc clone. I would say replica but it is not even that good. A POS I purchased for $74 plus shipping from WOW (SWI) so I could show the total rip off of the Clerc design patent. The Clerc bezel is a design covered by patent yet that does not stop the people who made this watch from sticking their noses up at US patent laws. Fuck these florida tv scam artists. This is not the first time SWI has done this http://www.watchlords.com/forum/viewtop ... 4&p=196335

Now it is time for Clerc to step up and put this company back in place. Use your imagination and come up with the tasteless watches Inflicta does and you are guaranteed success. By the way, this POS is really crap. Hard to grasp the bezel let alone turn it. Huge and looks it on your wrist. No elegance to this POS, it screams "look at me I am a shitty watch! Grab my wrist!"


Image

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


A little gratuitous british royal nudity.

Image
Image

1946-2006

“Your heart was warm and happy

With the lilt of Irish laughter

Every day and in every way

Now forever and ever after."
User avatar
TemerityB
ASSHAT
Posts: 16869
Joined: June 12th 2010, 10:00pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: Lets talk about Clerc Baby! and the SWI wannabe

Post by TemerityB » June 26th 2015, 11:38am

Hater! Don't you realize that Sappitek(TM) crystal has a 10-year-warranty?

You've been on SWI's case about this; more power to you. This forum has gotten results on this sort of thing before (trust me, I know) and it's high time these crap companies learn to knock it off with the knock-offs.

Just short of crusading journalism. Don't forget that. And to Clerc: Time to step up. Based on past results, it's just short of shooting fish in a barrel.
WatchGeeks will go down in watch forum history as the worst watch related site that existed. Trolls, threats, bannings, and owners and sponsors talking out of their collective asses to fleece people out of hard earned money. - Koimaster
User avatar
conjurer
ASSHAT & Master of Time
Posts: 31771
Joined: July 13th 2010, 10:00pm
Contact:

Re: Lets talk about Clerc Baby! and the SWI wannabe

Post by conjurer » June 26th 2015, 11:54am

While intellectual theft is certainly abhorant, I don't know if Clerc really wants to put out the cash for what could easily be a long legal fight. I believe they are a smaller, independant company, and lack the deep judicial pockets a brand like Swatch has.

While they could no doubt wipe the floor with SWI, the most they would probably get out of it would be a ruling for SWI to cease and desist selling the Scubador--a name perhaps even more retarded than its fans--which would be cold comfort indeed compared to what the lawyers would charge.
I find tv watches to be like the guys who raise their truck you need a fricken ladder to get in. It’s a attempt to look cool... that’s all.

--Hawkeye
User avatar
TemerityB
ASSHAT
Posts: 16869
Joined: June 12th 2010, 10:00pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: Lets talk about Clerc Baby! and the SWI wannabe

Post by TemerityB » June 26th 2015, 9:27pm

conjurer wrote: I believe they are a smaller, independant company, and lack the deep judicial pockets a brand like Swatch has.
While they could no doubt wipe the floor with SWI, the most they would probably get out of it would be a ruling for SWI to cease and desist selling the Scubador--a name perhaps even more retarded than its fans--which would be cold comfort indeed compared to what the lawyers would charge.


I dunno. This is gonna sound strange coming from me, who thinks TV watches by and large are repugnant, but except for the design theft issue (which is major) I really don't have a problem with SL or SWI, since for the most part they sell $50 watches for $50. Sure, I can't stand the TV aspect of it all, but at least they charge about what those Chinese watches are worth - unlike Invicter, where the markups on SAN IIIs would probably be shocking to discover the truth about.

Of course, this is all moot, and not the point here. SWI simply has to stop copping other people's designs, because it not only makes them look like a joke as they keep doing it over and over again, but it's also an affront to people who appreciate the craftsmanship of the real things. Plus, I don't understand the WOW business model at all - decent gray market offerings shrouded by mounds and mounds of self-produced el cheapo watches (SL, Red Line, Cabochon, Elini, Lucien Piccard and a couple of other brands are all now part of the SWI group).
WatchGeeks will go down in watch forum history as the worst watch related site that existed. Trolls, threats, bannings, and owners and sponsors talking out of their collective asses to fleece people out of hard earned money. - Koimaster
Post Reply

Return to “Clerc”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest