Spyderco Suing eBay Over Counterfeits

A place for members to share their interest in firearms, knives and deadly flashlights
Post Reply
User avatar
koimaster
Founder
Posts: 41930
Joined: December 16th 2009, 11:00pm
Location: Oregon, Thanks for visiting! Now go back home!
Contact:

Spyderco Suing eBay Over Counterfeits

Post by koimaster » July 25th 2017, 1:43pm

Spyderco has filed a lawsuit against eBay, one of the largest eCommerce retailers in the world. The suit centers around the sale of fake Spyderco knives on eBay.com, and alleges five offenses including trademark infringement.

http://knifenews.com/spyderco-suing-eba ... nterfeits/
Image

1946-2006

“Your heart was warm and happy

With the lilt of Irish laughter

Every day and in every way

Now forever and ever after."
User avatar
biglove
Watchlord WIS
Posts: 14532
Joined: October 27th 2013, 9:18am
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Deep South
Contact:

Re: Spyderco Suing eBay Over Counterfeits

Post by biglove » July 25th 2017, 3:52pm

Good!

Considering the huge amount of cash eBay makes as commission of the counterfeit goods, don't expect much to change unless the fine is HUGE!
"When things are at their darkest, pal, it's a brave man that can kick back and party." - Lt. Tuck Pendleton, Innerspace
User avatar
MKTheVintageBloke (Online)
Master of Time
Posts: 3583
Joined: December 7th 2016, 2:47pm
Facebook ID: 0
Contact:

Re: Spyderco Suing eBay Over Counterfeits

Post by MKTheVintageBloke » July 26th 2017, 7:47pm

I'm afraid it's something of an illusion, that the eBay staff can fully control every single thing sold through such a behemoth (in terms of the amount of items listed) of a site, and that through making the regulations more stringent, it all will out of a sudden be perfect for everyone. While the companies certainly have the right to protect their trademarks, I'm afraid that suing eBay might in the end turn out to be a wee bit like the story of Xerxes, the king of Persia, whipping the waters of Hellespont.

I would be surprised, if eBay didn't have a proper set of regulations concerning the procedure of removing a fake item after it's reported as such. For one, the number of reports on an item being a fake. I don't know how many times does an item have to be reported in order for eBay to remove it, however many times have I seen listings for fake watches being removed after being reported by WUS (and, likely, of a number of other forums as well) members. Did I see eBay fail to remove such an item? Yes. Quite a few times. Shit being relisted over and over, despite being reported? Seen that as well.

They don't have experts on every single thing in every single category of items sold through their site, as that's impossible to do on such a scale. Not even Chrono24, a far smaller site, can prevent every single sale of a fake or franken, and I've seen some seriously nasty shit sold there. And if one or two reports only could cut it, and have the listing and the seller removed, then every single seller could use that to get rid of his competitor(s).

I've also seen situations, where eBay didn't really show a lot of common sense (they did show a fair bit of zeal instead), and bowed to even the most nonsensical complaints regarding trademark infringement. An example of that is the infamous case of NATO straps (as much as with all the anti-NATO-strap sentiments here some might not like the example, it doesn't detract from its validity) , where some utter wanker of a strap seller in the US has registered "NATO" as his trademark (I don't know who in the authorities has allowed him to do that, but it must have been some countryside product of incest going on for a few generations), and had eBay remove hundreds of listings by dozens of sellers, in his pursuit of a monopoly for NATO straps.

I'm not saying that eBay is all good here, but the possible implications of potential changes need to be assessed. It's easy to say that they're not doing enough, and it's equally easy to fuck up the situation all the same with a change in eBay procedures. While a change in regulations might help the manufacturers, it can easily expose a lot of the sellers to an entire legion of motherfucking crooks like that NATO strap swindler. When it comes to regulations, deficit and excess are both easy to exploit, and that said, I just wonder if when the companies get what they want, it won't be out of the frying pan, and into the fire for many others.
You cannot explain away a wantonly immoral act, because you think that it is connected to some higher purpose.
Captain Jean-Luc Picard, Star Trek: The Next Generation
User avatar
tiktok

Re: Spyderco Suing eBay Over Counterfeits

Post by tiktok » July 26th 2017, 8:18pm

in my industry people buy an ounce bottle of perfume and then split the bottle into six smaller spray bottles and then sell the splits via the Bay or Facebook groups. It's pretty crazy when u release two hundred bottles of one scent and hundreds of people list it as part of their collection. Technically eBay bans this practice but they are just into reaming people and could care less about provenance.
DocKlock
Senior Member & WIS
Posts: 553
Joined: December 25th 2010, 11:00pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: CNY
Contact:

Re: Spyderco Suing eBay Over Counterfeits

Post by DocKlock » July 27th 2017, 5:33am

I've contacted eBay over counterfeit Spyderco as well as Surefire knives. Sometimes eBay takes it down, mostly not. If eBay does take it down the "seller" just pops up again under another "name" and the process starts all over again.
I ALWAYS avoid sellers with say, 10 sales and 2 are negative.
Also selling a $300 item for $30 is also a dead giveaway.
Buyer beware!!!!!
Maybe I'm fortunate, but eBay has always stood behind me in a questionable sale from a scammer.
Post Reply

Return to “The Weapons Cache”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest