Was the Navy’s F-111 Really That Bad?

Cars, planes, boats & movies
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 46168
Joined: December 16th 2009, 11:00pm
Location: Oregon, Thanks for visiting! Now go back home!

Was the Navy’s F-111 Really That Bad?

Post by koimaster » September 2nd 2021, 7:19am

The controversy swirling around the F-35 joint strike fighter echoes previous battles fought over aircraft tasked with serving more than one master. Perhaps the central question in today’s debate is whether a single airplane designed to perform many missions adequately is a better and truly more affordable choice than several airplanes, each designed to perform a single mission flawlessly. In 1968, the Navy had an unequivocal answer: No. But were they right?

In the early 1960s both the Navy and the Air Force were shopping for new combat aircraft. The Navy needed a carrier-based interceptor capable of engaging Soviet bombers hundreds of miles away, before they could launch long-range anti-ship missiles; the Air Force required a supersonic, ground-hugging penetrator that could duck in under enemy radar and dodge surface-to-air missiles.

https://www.airspacemag.com/military-av ... gileFzz8Ew


“Your heart was warm and happy

With the lilt of Irish laughter

Every day and in every way

Now forever and ever after."
Post Reply

Return to “The Drive in”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest