- ocean
- Administrator
- Posts: 3449
- Joined: June 12th 2011, 10:00pm
- Location: Daytona Beach
- Contact:
GQ best watches of 2022
To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them. George Mason
- AlbertaTime
- Master of Time
- Posts: 4390
- Joined: October 13th 2010, 10:00pm
- Location: Peace River, Alberta
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
I like the Speedie!!
Curator: Alberta Museum of Chinese Horology in Peace River
"That stone buddha deserves all the birdshit it gets. I wave my skinny arms like a tall flower in the wind." Ikkyu
"That stone buddha deserves all the birdshit it gets. I wave my skinny arms like a tall flower in the wind." Ikkyu
- jason_recliner
- ASSHAT
- Posts: 9884
- Joined: September 17th 2011, 10:00pm
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
5 watches would be enough,10 at a push. 50? How many watches were released in 2022? 55? 60?
Copyright Reclinervision 2020 Productions. All rights reserved.
If it thinks, it stinks
If it thinks, it stinks
- smellody (Online)
- Owner
- Posts: 10271
- Joined: December 18th 2009, 11:00pm
- Location: OR
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
Yes. I think that is every non-TV watch made this year.
I was unaware of the new Hamilton pocket watch. . . The hunt begins.
I was unaware of the new Hamilton pocket watch. . . The hunt begins.

- DoctorIvey
- Senior Member & WIS
- Posts: 1583
- Joined: May 19th 2011, 10:00pm
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
Imagine how disappointed Franck Mueller must have been to have collaborated (X’ed) with Bamford and Popeye but unable to get Justin Bieber aboard. A nearly perfect shitheel wartch despite the omission.
- robatsu (Online)
- Master of Time
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: February 10th 2015, 7:53am
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
The mint dial Tissot was nice.
The Grand Seiko on the list is mislabeled. Seemed awful cheap for a GS even by prices before the recent run up.
So I looked it up and it is a King Seiko, and a quite nice one. I’ve long wanted the SCVN001 but they are spendy, nice alternative here
The Grand Seiko on the list is mislabeled. Seemed awful cheap for a GS even by prices before the recent run up.
So I looked it up and it is a King Seiko, and a quite nice one. I’ve long wanted the SCVN001 but they are spendy, nice alternative here
- smellody (Online)
- Owner
- Posts: 10271
- Joined: December 18th 2009, 11:00pm
- Location: OR
- Contact:
- Datsun240Z71
- Founding Member - WIS
- Posts: 3027
- Joined: February 9th 2010, 11:00pm
- Contact:
- codguy
- ASSHAT
- Posts: 9304
- Joined: June 9th 2011, 10:00pm
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
.
That mint Tissot would make a cute chick watch and that Zenith Pantone is simply gay as hell.
On the other hand, I would definitely wear the Girard-Perregaux, Speedmaster '57 & A Lange & Soehne 1815.
Youz can keep the rest.
That mint Tissot would make a cute chick watch and that Zenith Pantone is simply gay as hell.
On the other hand, I would definitely wear the Girard-Perregaux, Speedmaster '57 & A Lange & Soehne 1815.
Youz can keep the rest.
.
Nice to have a discussion with differing viewpoints as adults, agreement or not. I am beginning to like this place. - koimaster
.
Nice to have a discussion with differing viewpoints as adults, agreement or not. I am beginning to like this place. - koimaster
.
- Nuvolari
- Watchlord WIS
- Posts: 3387
- Joined: August 7th 2014, 5:53pm
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
I was also struck by the super-value to be found in owning a watch featuring a cartoon character that even the wearer most likely barely remembers - for the unbelievably low low price of just under THIRTEEN THOUSAND POUNDS STERLING. GTFOOH!DoctorIvey wrote: ↑December 3rd 2022, 11:20pmImagine how disappointed Franck Mueller must have been to have collaborated (X’ed) with Bamford and Popeye but unable to get Justin Bieber aboard. A nearly perfect shitheel wartch despite the omission.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Nuvolari on December 4th 2022, 11:24am, edited 1 time in total.
- Nuvolari
- Watchlord WIS
- Posts: 3387
- Joined: August 7th 2014, 5:53pm
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
Nah - that Tissot’s cool once you get the mechanical movement crammed in there. Even a big burly dude like you could wear that in style.
But that Zenith... I assume there was not sufficient room to include the model’s complete name. They dropped “Good Taste” as in, Defy Good Taste Extreme, which isn’t that clever once you see it.
- robatsu (Online)
- Master of Time
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: February 10th 2015, 7:53am
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
And how come this guy or the black or two tone variants not make the list,
41mm width, 11mm thickness, super wearable 6105-8000 reissue pretty much,
Why isn’t this in the list?
41mm width, 11mm thickness, super wearable 6105-8000 reissue pretty much,
Why isn’t this in the list?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- robatsu (Online)
- Master of Time
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: February 10th 2015, 7:53am
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
Sorry, 12.3 thickness
Here is all three models
Here is all three models
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- conjurer (Online)
- Owner
- Posts: 34365
- Joined: July 13th 2010, 10:00pm
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
To be fair, that one looks a lot better than most Franck Mullers.Nuvolari wrote: ↑December 4th 2022, 11:11amI was also struck by the super-value to be found in owning a watch featuring a cartoon character that even the wearer most likely barely remembers - for the unbelievably low low price of just under THIRTEEN THOUSAND POUNDS STERLING.DoctorIvey wrote: ↑December 3rd 2022, 11:20pmImagine how disappointed Franck Mueller must have been to have collaborated (X’ed) with Bamford and Popeye but unable to get Justin Bieber aboard. A nearly perfect shitheel wartch despite the omission.
64D0ACAC-E5D6-4A19-B7C3-0BBFB05F15B8.jpeg
GTFOOH!
- codguy
- ASSHAT
- Posts: 9304
- Joined: June 9th 2011, 10:00pm
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
Because of the lame date window would be my guess
.
Nice to have a discussion with differing viewpoints as adults, agreement or not. I am beginning to like this place. - koimaster
.
Nice to have a discussion with differing viewpoints as adults, agreement or not. I am beginning to like this place. - koimaster
.
- robatsu (Online)
- Master of Time
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: February 10th 2015, 7:53am
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
I read four or five reviews and such on this watch. Only one mentioned the date window, but felt very strongly about in a negative way
Also alluded to sort of a running controversy in general about date windows such as this one
I thought it was interesting as I don’t have much feeling about date windows generally other than I’m happy to buy watches without them, don’t use them for the most part
Eyes are getting too poor among other reasons, like less reason to care about the date as I’m not working now etc
So this is not to dispute but to help me understand what is the issue with this date window. I’m just curious
The reviewer didn’t explain just said there were strong opinions about it
Thanks
- smellody (Online)
- Owner
- Posts: 10271
- Joined: December 18th 2009, 11:00pm
- Location: OR
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
Interesting. I went looking to give myself an understanding too. I searched the dial then finally found the peephole of the date window.robatsu wrote: ↑December 5th 2022, 2:47pmI read four or five reviews and such on this watch. Only one mentioned the date window, but felt very strongly about in a negative way
Also alluded to sort of a running controversy in general about date windows such as this one
I thought it was interesting as I don’t have much feeling about date windows generally other than I’m happy to buy watches without them, don’t use them for the most part
Eyes are getting too poor among other reasons, like less reason to care about the date as I’m not working now etc
So this is not to dispute but to help me understand what is the issue with this date window. I’m just curious
The reviewer didn’t explain just said there were strong opinions about it
Thanks
The 4:30 placement is a little unorthodox, but I kind of like the inconspicuousness of the round v square peephole.
Perhaps Cod is having a round hole 🕳 square box
Back to the unorthodox 4:30 placement, it does impact symmetry, but treatment for me kind of voids the issue.
That's my humble take.

- robatsu (Online)
- Master of Time
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: February 10th 2015, 7:53am
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
I do have to say looking at it it isn’t the prettiest thing and is less obtrusive on the white dial version which s my fave
- robatsu (Online)
- Master of Time
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: February 10th 2015, 7:53am
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
And it’s obvious the date window they should have stuck with the original
That seems unarguable
That seems unarguable
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- robatsu (Online)
- Master of Time
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: February 10th 2015, 7:53am
- Contact:
Re: GQ best watches of 2022
I’ve come to agree with the lame date window
That type works in other watch styles and invariably it is a measure to make it discrete
But that violates the design unity of a dive watch, one of which is high readability in low visibility situations
So a nicely discrete complication had no place here.
So yeah, fail, too bad nice piece otherwise
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest